This essay by Anthony M. Cummings (published on www.insidehighered.com) uses the example of the Italian Renaissance to argue that history, and more generally, the humanities can be defended for their vocational utility. We believe that arguments about vocational utility miss the essence of the humanities, but in a democracy citizens need to make a living and Cummings offers some useful suggestions for how the capacities developed by the humanities (including ethical judgment, awareness of the social and political context, aesthetic sensibilities, foreign languages, and rhetoric) are useful for careers in fields as varied as bioethics, urban planning, diplomacy, politics, and art conservation. Here is the whole essay:
History shows: the humanities have vocational utility
(essay) Insidehighered.com
Submitted by Anthony M. Cummings on October 10, 2013 -
3:00am
The current state and future prospects of the humanities are
occasioning considerable anxious comment.
Many humanists are sadly resigned to a belief that the humanities have
irrevocably ceded pride of place to the social sciences and sciences; and,
indeed, the social sciences and sciences generate and command much intellectual
energy in the 21st-century university, for understandable reasons.
The usual remedies proposed for this state of affairs have
seemed to me to be limited at best and perhaps even misguided. A typical
argument for the utility of the humanistic disciplines is that studying them
enhances critical thought and powers of expression, and one would certainly
agree.
But I wonder whether such an argument will gain much
traction with college-age students and especially their parents. The data
suggest a clear national trend away from the humanistic disciplines toward
those that seem to offer a different kind of promise or outcome: a vocational
utility or practical applicability. Under such circumstances, abstract
arguments about the enhancement of critical thought – no matter how skillfully
they are advanced, no matter how much one might agree with them – are less
likely to prevail.
I propose here one different kind of case for the
humanities, one that identifies – and celebrates – their specific vocational
utility.