Liberal education is becoming rare in America. At the time of the founding it was de rigeur for anyone who aspired to public life. In 1900, it remained the norm in America’s colleges. And as the “core curricula” of colleges and universities in 1950 attest, it remained the central, defining feature of undergraduate education as late as the mid-twentieth century. Today it is uncommon.The symposiasts thoughtfully address a variety of questions, starting with the central ones - what is liberal education and why does it matter if it is threatened? In his introductory remarks, Timothy Burns nicely sketches some of the main questions considered more fully in the papers:
Liberal education is becoming
rare in America.
At the time of
the founding it was de rigeur for anyone who aspired to public life. In 1900, it remained
the norm in America’s colleges. And as the “core curricula” of colleges and universities in 1950 attest, it remained
the central, defining feature of undergraduate
education as late as the mid-twentieth century. Today it is uncommon. The vast majority
of students graduating from state universities and colleges follow curricula that prepare them, or so they hope, for lucrative jobs. As for private universities
and liberal arts colleges, with a few noteworthy exceptions, only administrators charged with raising funds still claim that there is or should be a coherent and common
liberal education of their students. Their watchword is “diversity,” and their courses are more and more specialized in areas of peculiar interest to their faculty.